Under sections 271 and 292 of the SFO, a person or corporation may avail himself of a defence if he falls within one of the categories set out below.
Defence |
Types/Limbs |
Provision in SFO |
1. The dealing, counselling or procuring was made: |
a. directorship: |
s 271(1)(a) |
b. underwriting agreement: |
s 271(1)(b) |
|
c. liquidator, etc.: |
s 271(1)(c) |
|
2. ‘Chinese wall’ which is established for a corporation when three elements are satisfied: |
i) a director or employee of the corporation possessed the inside information but the person who made the decision for the corporation to enter into the transaction did not have the inside information; and |
s 271(2)(a) |
ii) arrangements are in place to ensure that: |
s 271(2)(b) |
|
iii) the inside information was in fact not so communicated to any person who made the decision and none of the directors or employees who had the inside information in fact so gave the advice to any person who made the decision. |
s 271(2)(c) |
|
3. No profit motive test |
the transaction was entered into or the disclosure was made not for the purpose of securing or increasing a profit or avoiding or reducing a loss by using inside information. |
s 271(3) |
4. Agency |
The individual deals, counsels, or procures another person to deal as agent, and that he/she did not select or advise on the selection of the relevant securities or derivatives, and did not know that his/her principal was a person connected with the corporation or had inside information. |
s 271(4) |
5. Off-market transactions between insiders |
The individual and the other party to the dealing in question entered into the dealing directly with him/her, and at the time of the transaction, the other party to the dealing knew, or ought reasonably to have known, of the inside information. This defence is only available if at the time of the transaction, the dealing in question was not required to be recorded on the Stock Exchange or to be notified to a recognised exchange company under its rules. |
s 271(5) |
6. Dealing with an insider |
(i) at the time when the individual entered into the dealing, other than as a person who has counselled or procured the other party to the dealing to deal in the relevant securities or derivatives, the other party to the dealing knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the individual was a person connected with the corporation; or |
s 271(6) |
(ii) the individual establishes that through his/her counselling or procuring another person to deal, the other person did not counsel or procure another party to the dealing in question to deal and at the time of counselling or procuring, the other party to the dealing knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the other person was a person connected with the corporation. |
s 271(7) |
|
7. Market information |
The individual acted in connection with any dealing in securities or derivatives which was under consideration or was the subject of negotiation, or in the course of a series of such dealings, with a view to facilitating the accomplishment of the dealing or the series of dealings and the inside information was market information arising directly out of his/her involvement in the dealing or the series of dealings. |
s 271(8) |
“Market information” means information consisting one or more of the following facts:
|
s 271(10) |
|
8. Market contract |
The dealing is a market contract, which is a contract subject to the rules of a recognised clearing house entered into by the clearing house with a clearing participant pursuant to a novation which is both in accordance with those rules and for the purposes of the clearing and settlement of transactions in securities or futures contracts effected on a recognised stock market or a recognised futures market or subject to the rules of a recognised exchange company. |
s 271(9) |
9. Trustees and personal representatives |
A trustee or personal representative has a defence if he/she can prove that he/she acted on advice obtained in good faith from another person and that other person appeared to him/her to be an appropriate person from whom to seek the advice. Furthermore, it did not appear to the trustee or personal representative that, if the other person had dealt in the relevant securities or derivatives, insider dealing would take place. |
s 272 |
10. Exercise of a pre-existing right |
The individual dealt in the relevant securities or derivatives by way of his/her exercise of a right to subscribe for or otherwise acquire such securities or derivatives and the right was granted or was derived from securities or derivatives that were held by him/her before he/she became aware of any inside information. |
s 273 |
Statutory backing to corporations’ obligation to disclose inside information under the Listing Rules (SFO, Pt XIVA)
Where inside information has come to its attention, a listed corporation must disclose the information to the public as soon as reasonably practicable. Once this happens, the information ceases to be inside information.
Reference: SFO, s 307B(1)
The obligations to disclose inside information under SFO, Pt XIVA are separate and distinct from the disclosure requirements under the Listing Rules and the Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-backs.
There are exceptions to the general obligation of disclosure. A listed corporation is not required to disclose any inside information if the disclosure is prohibited by statute or by court order. A listed corporation is also exempt from disclosing any inside information if it takes reasonable precautions to preserve the confidentiality of the information. The confidentiality of the information is preserved if one or more of the following applies:
- the information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation
- the information is a trade secret
- the information concerns the provision of liquidity support from the exchange fund or a central bank
- the disclosure is waived by the SFC and any condition imposed in relation to the waiver is complied with
Reference: SFO, 307D(1), (2)
Every officer of a listed corporation must take all reasonable measures from time to time to ensure that proper safeguards exist to prevent a breach of a disclosure requirement in relation to the corporation.
Reference: SFO, 307G(1)
The SFC is responsible for enforcing the disclosure of inside information obligations under SFO. Where the Stock Exchange becomes aware of a possible breach of the obligations, it will refer it to the SFC. The Stock Exchange will not normally take disciplinary action under the Listing Rules on its own accord, and does so only when the SFC decides not to pursue the matter under the SFO instead.
Reference: SFO, 307I
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED ON LEXISNEXIS