Market Misconduct Tribunal sanctions Magic Holdings International Limited and its five directors

Market Misconduct Tribunal sanctions Magic Holdings International Limited and its five directors

Market Misconduct Tribunal sanctions Magic Holdings International Limited and its five directors 1400 788 Hugo

On 11 March 2021, the Market Misconduct Tribunal (the “MMT”) fined Magic Holdings International Limited (“Magic”) and five of its directors a total of $4 million after they were found to be culpable of late disclosure of inside information on L’Oréal S.A.’s (“L’Oréal”) proposed acquisition of Magic in 2013.

The five directors are (1) chairman, Mr. Stephen Tang Siu Kun; (2) executive directors, Mr. She Yu Yuan, (3) Mr. Luo Yan Wen and (4) Mr. Cheng Wing Hong who was also the company secretary at the material time; and (5) non-executive director, Mr. Sun Yan.

Background

Since early March 2013, Magic and L’Oréal had discussions concerning the latter’s acquisition proposal. In a meeting on 27 April 2013, L’Oréal’s and Magic’s founders agreed that an offer price of not less than $5.5 per share would be considered by Magic’s board of directors.

Mr. Stephen Tang, Mr. She and Mr. Luo indicated to L’Oréal that they would contact Magic’s institutional investors to gauge their interest in the acquisition proposal and they would also support L’Oréal’s request to Magic’s board of directors to carry out due diligence. However, Magic did not disclose the information relating to L’Oréal’s acquisition proposal to the public until August 2013.

In the MMT’s view, the negotiations between Magic and L’Oréal had gone beyond testing the waters and hence the relevant information constituted inside information. Furthermore, Magic’s breach of the disclosure requirements was due to the fact that its directors were not informed in a timely manner of all information relevant to the determination of whether it was necessary to make disclosure about the potential acquisition by L’Oréal to the public.

A key takeaway is that the MMT reiterated the importance of a listed company taking all reasonable measures to monitor the confidentiality of the proposed acquisition and disclosing inside information to the public as soon as reasonably practicable after having knowledge that the confidentiality of such information had not been preserved.

A further important takeaway from this case is that company secretaries of listed companies can have regulatory liability on par with directors for failures to disclose inside information. The MMT found Mr. Cheng liable on the basis that Mr. Cheng, as the company secretary, had been negligent and failed to take all reasonable measures from time to time to ensure that proper safeguards existed to prevent the breach of the disclosure requirement, contrary to section 307G of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571).

A copy of the Case Report:(Part I), (Part II) and (PART III) is available on the MMT website.

For advice on your disclosure requirements in relation to inside information, please contact us for a discussion today.

Back to top
Privacy Preferences

When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
Click to enable/disable video embeds.
Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.