Judiciary Consultation on the Legislative Amendments to Enable Remote Hearing

Judiciary Consultation on the Legislative Amendments to Enable Remote Hearing

Judiciary Consultation on the Legislative Amendments to Enable Remote Hearing 1400 787 Charing

According to the submissions published by the Law Society of Hong Kong, the Judiciary Administration published a legislative proposal to enable remote hearing on February 2021 (the “Consultation Paper”).

Remote hearing, where necessary and appropriate, is already permitted under the current judicial system in all levels of civil courts and is provided for in the Judiciary’s Guidance Notes.

The Consultation Paper puts forward a range of issues to be considered.  One notable issue is the issue of “Open Justice”.  The requirement of open justice entails the need to make available the means by which the public may gain access to such proceedings conducted by way of remote hearing.

Under the current system, the public have to attend a specific venue e.g. a courtroom to view a hearing.  It is proposed that a remote hearing should also be broadcast in Judiciary premises such as open court rooms.

The Consultation Paper acknowledges that while remote hearing by technological means for civil matters is welcomed and to be encouraged, it is equally important that administration of justice would not be disturbed by improper access or illegal recording of the proceedings.  It remains to be seen how the Judiciary Administration will propose to implement safeguards (including appropriate penalties for unauthorized transmission of remote hearing) for remote hearings, especially in exceptional circumstances such as where the general public may be excluded from the court buildings.

From the submissions of the Hong Kong Law Society, it can be seen that there are considerably more objections towards remote hearings for criminal hearings in the legal community and that it should only be allowed in very exceptional circumstances.  The objections stem mostly from concerns over a defendant’s fundamental right to be tried in person in an open court, the right to confront witnesses, and the ability to communicate privately and effectively with his or her legal representatives, all of such would potentially affect the defendant’s ability to fully participate in his or her criminal proceedings.

The current proposal for codifying the current position and Guidance Notes in a legislative bill is certainly welcome and represents a positive move for advancing Court technology.

Contact us today if you would like to find out more about our services in dispute resolution.

Back to top
Privacy Preferences

When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in the form of cookies. Here you can change your Privacy preferences. It is worth noting that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we are able to offer.

Click to enable/disable Google Analytics tracking code.
Click to enable/disable Google Fonts.
Click to enable/disable Google Maps.
Click to enable/disable video embeds.
Our website uses cookies, mainly from 3rd party services. Define your Privacy Preferences and/or agree to our use of cookies.